Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to get rid of the ability to "forum shop" by excluding a debtor's place of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding cash or money equivalents from the "principal properties" equation. Additionally, any equity interest in an affiliate will be considered situated in the same area as the principal.
Generally, this testimony has been focused on questionable 3rd party release provisions executed in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Boy Scouts of America, and lots of Catholic diocese personal bankruptcies. These provisions frequently force lenders to launch non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's strategy of reorganization, even though such releases are perhaps not allowed, at least in some circuits, by the Insolvency Code.
In effort to stamp out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to limit "forum shopping" by forbiding entities from filing in any venue other than where their home office or principal physical assetsexcluding money and equity interestsare located. Ostensibly, these costs would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other United States districts, and steer cases far from the favored courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Despite their laudable purpose, these proposed modifications could have unanticipated and possibly negative repercussions when seen from a worldwide restructuring prospective. While congressional statement and other commentators presume that place reform would simply make sure that domestic business would file in a different jurisdiction within the United States, it is an unique possibility that international debtors might pass on the US Insolvency Courts completely.
Without the factor to consider of money accounts as an opportunity toward eligibility, numerous foreign corporations without tangible assets in the United States might not certify to submit a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in any United States jurisdiction. Second, even if they do certify, international debtors might not have the ability to rely on access to the typical and convenient reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Given the complicated issues frequently at play in a worldwide restructuring case, this might trigger the debtor and financial institutions some unpredictability. This unpredictability, in turn, may inspire international debtors to file in their own nations, or in other more advantageous nations, instead. Especially, this proposed location reform comes at a time when many countries are imitating the United States and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which emphasized liquidation, the brand-new Code's goal is to reorganize and protect the entity as a going issue. Therefore, debt restructuring contracts might be approved with as little as 30 percent approval from the general financial obligation. Unlike the US, Italy's new Code will not feature an automated stay of enforcement actions by creditors.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the country's approval of 3rd party release provisions. In Canada, companies usually reorganize under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Companies' Financial Institutions Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring strategies.
The current court decision explains, though, that despite the CBCA's more limited nature, 3rd party release provisions might still be appropriate. Business may still get themselves of a less cumbersome restructuring available under the CBCA, while still getting the advantages of third party releases. Effective as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession treatment carried out beyond official bankruptcy procedures.
Reliable as of January 1, 2021, Germany's new Act upon the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Businesses provides for pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German business had no option to restructure their debts through the courts. Now, distressed companies can hire German courts to restructure their debts and otherwise maintain the going issue worth of their business by utilizing a lot of the same tools available in the United States, such as keeping control of their organization, enforcing cram down restructuring plans, and implementing collection moratoriums.
Motivated by Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring procedure mostly in effort to help little and medium sized businesses. While prior law was long slammed as too pricey and too intricate since of its "one size fits all" approach, this brand-new legislation includes the debtor in belongings model, and offers for a streamlined liquidation procedure when necessary In June 2020, the UK enacted the Business Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA offers for a collection moratorium, revokes certain provisions of pre-insolvency agreements, and allows entities to propose an arrangement with investors and financial institutions, all of which permits the formation of a cram-down strategy similar to what may be accomplished under Chapter 11 of the United States Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Business (Modification) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made significant legal modifications to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As an outcome, the law has significantly boosted the restructuring tools offered in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In Might of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Insolvency Code, which totally revamped the personal bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize more financial investment in the country by offering higher certainty and performance to the restructuring process.
Offered these current changes, worldwide debtors now have more options than ever. Even without the proposed constraints on eligibility, foreign entities may less need to flock to the US as before. Even more, should the United States' venue laws be changed to avoid easy filings in particular hassle-free and useful venues, worldwide debtors may start to think about other places.
Unique thanks to Dallas partner Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this content under the supervision of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles office.
Consumer insolvency filings rose 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 customer filings that month alone. Business filings leapt 49% year-over-year the greatest January level considering that 2018. The numbers show what debt experts call "slow-burn monetary strain" that's been building for years. If you're struggling, you're not an outlier.
Customer personal bankruptcy filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Commercial filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the greatest January industrial filing level since 2018. For all of 2025, consumer filings grew nearly 14%. (Source: Law360 Bankruptcy Authority)44,282 Customer Filings in Jan 2026 +9%Year-Over-Year Increase +49%Industrial Filings YoY +14%Customer Filings All of 2025 January 2026 bankruptcy filings: 44,282 customer, 1,378 industrial the greatest January commercial level considering that 2018 Experts priced quote by Law360 explain the pattern as reflecting "slow-burn monetary strain." That's a refined method of stating what I've been enjoying for years: individuals do not snap financially overnight.
Latest Posts
Everything to Know Before Filing for Bankruptcy
Reliable Strategies to Negotiate Overdue Debt
Accessing Nonprofit Insolvency Help and Support in 2026

